A few discussion about a cancer problem.

How does the wound heal, the transformation of a purulent wound into normal tissue? Two possibilities  known.

1) The so-called primary healing, when the affected area, deformed and full of pus, turns into normal tissue with the same structure, with the same functionality as it was before the disease.

2) Secondary healing, when a certain number of parenchymal cells  replaced by connective tissue elements penetrating blood and lymphatic capillaries by newborns.

If scarring occurs in areas with a large functional surface, for example, such as in the lungs and pleura, functional activity  not fully restored. Scars after the disappearance of acne, pustules, boils do not present much of a hindrance to the corresponding functions.

But if recovery ends with the formation of rough scar tissue, for example, in the pancreas, adrenal glands, in the thyroid gland, pituitary gland, ovaries, then the connective tissue, instead of maintaining its protective role, strangles parenchymal cells and provokes deaths.

In the brain, where each neuron is a microfield of explosive forces, the general staff of logic, a superradiophonic center with 14 billion radio-frequency receivers and transmitters that continuously send orders to every cell, every tissue, continuously receive signals from the smallest points of our body, which put the filing cabinet in order. our memory, plan and manage our physical and intellectual work, which create, dream, in this wonderful ensemble, surpassing all the electronic machines of the world in grandeur and depth, - in this brain, every scar, even the smallest one, is accompanied by a difficult-to-restore normal course of the main body functions ... Under the apparent immutability of tissues are hidden processes, the meaning of which we only begin to understand with difficulty.

As the life of plants is subject to the orders of the roots from below, so the life of a complex organism  controlled by the neurons of the brain from above. It   known that the cells in our body a regularly renewed. The ability of cells to reproduce does not stop after they mature. So, each digestion of food causes a temporary hyperleukocytosis, the birth of leukocytes. The formation of new liver cells after surgery  known; renal hypertrophy  known, which develops after amputation of a diseased kidney. Hypertrophy in this case is not a consequence of an increase in the size of renal cells, it is the appearance of new cells.

It must be assumed that almost all cells, with the exception, perhaps, of the brain cells, retain their embryonic character, their embryonic capacity for growth and development. We store in our body a constant source of rejuvenation, but we are not able to manage it. So, if this dynamism of embryonic cells  controlled and constantly controlled by a vigilant alert brain, then it serves to protect the integrity of the organism. 

Before every aggression from the outside, be it an infection or injury, the body builds a defense system in order, on the one hand, to destroy the invader, and on the other, to restore the losses inflicted. In cases of tumors, on the contrary, the same organism seems to contribute to its death. Having ceased his magnificent defense, his wonderful regulation, he seems to be working on his own destruction. It sends capillaries, arterioles, arteries with their branches to the accumulation of the initial newly formed cells to feed tumor cells, which multiply rapidly and grow into large tumors.

The body (its brain) does not fight these deadly phenomena; it supplies the tumors with sufficient nutrition. He gives the enemy his own supplies, his weapons, his lines of communication, as a commander-in-chief who has betrayed his country and betrayed it. Confusion begins, the numbness of the army, confusion in the headquarters of the brain. This is reminiscent of the sad days of Hitler's invasion of 1940. The nation's brain was paralyzed. The same thing happens with the birth of malignant tumors.

Such observations force us to seek explanations for these phenomena outside the area where the first accumulation of malignant cells formed. Can't we assume that the defense system depends on a supercenter that controls, commanders and organizes the struggle? If this supercenter, for some unknown pathological reason, no longer fulfills its task, then uncontrolled activity occurs in the areas of the affected tissues and, as a result, excessive proliferation of tumor cells occurs. It can be assumed that the origin of this "delusion" of the supercenter should be sought in a change in its metabolism as a result of overstimulation or the influence of some endoagent from another region of the brain.

The increase in cancer cases in our turbulent era could create the mental climate behind these brain diseases. Viruses, nutritional deficiencies, and harmful chemicals are secondary factors. Rebuild your brain if you want to act logically against malignant tumors. Remember that the thickness of the blood capillary wall does not exceed one micron (micrometer), remember that the border between life and death is so fragile, given the huge number of emotional shocks that are endured every day throughout the years. To free the body from a malignant tumor, first of all, it is necessary to free our brain from false concepts, to change the attitude towards the nature of tumors. The first step is to restore all the possibilities of regulation and control of the brain. And we are not unarmed.

In 1886, the first institute for cancer research and treatment was established in Moscow. About a hundred years have passed since then, now there are at least 400 cancer institutes in the world and at least 200 thousand oncologists have devoted their lives to this problem. There are cancer leagues in every country. Every three years, cancer specialists gather for a grand convention to take stock of their diligent research, which is practically zero - the sum of innumerable zeros!

Why are we confronted with research failures for a whole century, undertaken by the majority of people capable and active? The reason is very simple: a cancer cell was studied separately. We didn’t take the trouble to get to know the cancer patient with all his endless reactions. And when one is limited to the study of one cell or one tissue as an isolated organ, an obituary is always obtained and never biology.

One should always think about fatigue and loss of connective tissue ability to perform its protective role (in the case of adenoma and epithelioma), as well as with anarchic irrepressible growth of connective tissue in sarcoma. But the fatigue of the tissues in the first case and the disturbance of the dynamics in the second are equally subordinate to the supercentre, which, instead of thinking about salvation, protecting its fortress, gives the order to open the fortifications.

Based on our long medical practice, we allow ourselves to assert that it is necessary to review their work in all anti-cancer institutions. Examining tens of thousands of patients with cavernous open or closed tuberculosis, we have never seen a single case of lung cancer among them. On the other hand, we never found traces of pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with malignant tumors, neither at the time of examination, nor in the anamnesis. Is this a coincidence, or is there an incompatibility of tuberculous infiltration with the proliferation of tumor cells? We are inclined to admit the likelihood of the second hypothesis.